Hi
Great to see the appearance of Jdownload, unfortunately there seems to be a small wrinkle in it! The tool works fine if you are working in folders listed under the home directory for the user, but if the folders are under a virtual directory then it doesn't load files/sub-folders and let you download anything.
Did a quick test to prove this and if you switch virtual directory to home directory then Jdownload works fine. Also is there an individual size limit and batch size limit when using this tool?
Thanks
Chris
Jdownload issue using virtual directories
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 10:34 pm
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2082
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 6:09 am
Re: Jdownload issue using virtual directories
Yes, this bug is already fixed, please download the new version: http://www.wftpserver.com/bbs/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=1303" rel="nofollow
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 10:34 pm
Re: Jdownload issue using virtual directories
Hi
Just re-installed jdownload plugin and noticed that the applet loads fine and lists the files, but as it recursives through top level files and then hits a child folder it then takes forever (minutes+) for each child folder file (even though files are say 100kb). Very strange!
Thanks
Chris
Just re-installed jdownload plugin and noticed that the applet loads fine and lists the files, but as it recursives through top level files and then hits a child folder it then takes forever (minutes+) for each child folder file (even though files are say 100kb). Very strange!
Thanks
Chris
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2082
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 6:09 am
Re: Jdownload issue using virtual directories
If you have lots of files and folder, maybe it will take a few minutes, and if you have installed some Anti-virus software, please try to stop it.
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 10:34 pm
Re: Jdownload issue using virtual directories
Hi
Works fine outside our business network, so maybe proxy or Symantec. Hope clients aren't using a similiar set-up!
Thanks
Works fine outside our business network, so maybe proxy or Symantec. Hope clients aren't using a similiar set-up!
Thanks